Results: 783 books
Sort By:
NewTrending

Social legislation and social activity : being addresses delivered at the sixth annual meeting of the American academy of political and social science of Philadelphia

American Academy of Political and Social Science

"Social Legislation and Social Activity" is a collection of addresses delivered at the Sixth Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Political and Social Science in Philadelphia, published in the early 20th century. This compilation explores various social issues of its time, including transportation, labor relations, housing, and child labor, reflecting on the socio-economic challenges and legislative responses in a rapidly industrializing nation. The opening portion of the work introduces a thought-provoking address concerning the social effects of transportation delivered by Martin A. Knapp, Chairman of the United States Interstate Commerce Commission. Knapp discusses the evolution of transportation from its primitive roots to the advent of steam-powered systems, illustrating how these developments have significantly transformed social and economic structures. He emphasizes that transportation shapes commerce, population distribution, and social interactions, raising questions about the accompanying challenges and responsibilities that emerge with such progress. This sets a foundational context for the subsequent addresses that will tackle various critical issues related to industrial relations and social legislation. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

The Cholera: the claims of the poor upon the rich

Thomas Beggs

"The Cholera: the claims of the poor upon the rich" by Thomas Beggs is a public health treatise written in the early to mid-19th century, likely during the Victorian era. The book addresses the social and sanitary conditions that precipitate cholera outbreaks, emphasizing the responsibilities of the wealthy towards the impoverished classes. It argues that the neglect of public health measures exacerbates the plight of the poor, making them more susceptible to diseases like cholera and typhus. In this work, Beggs provides a stark analysis of the socio-economic factors contributing to public health crises. He illustrates this through vivid accounts of cholera outbreaks, noting their disproportionate impact on the urban poor living in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions. The author highlights specific cases, such as the tragic deaths within families due to the lack of proper drainage and clean water. He lays bare the moral and economic implications of ignoring public health, advocating for immediate action to improve living conditions, drainage systems, and overall sanitation. Through his arguments, Beggs implores the affluent classes to acknowledge their societal obligations and work towards creating a healthier environment for all, lest they risk the stability of society itself. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

Castes In India

B. R. (Bhimrao Ramji) Ambedkar

"Castes In India" by B. R. Ambedkar is an academic paper presented as part of his contributions to the field of anthropology, specifically focusing on the caste system in India. Written during the early 20th century, this work delves into the complexities and origins of caste, examining it as an intricate social institution that shapes various aspects of Indian society. Ambedkar aims to shed light on the mechanisms, genesis, and development of caste as a social construct within Hindu society. In this significant piece, Ambedkar discusses the concept of caste and how it functions within a broader social framework. He critically analyzes definitions of caste from various scholars, emphasizing that endogamy—the practice of marrying within one's own group—is fundamental to the caste system. The author explores the historical and cultural influences that led to the establishment of caste, asserting that it arose from the desire for social stratification among classes, particularly among the Brahmins. Through a detailed examination of customs such as widow burning (Sati), enforced widowhood, and child marriage, he posits that these practices not only sought to maintain endogamy but also served to regulate the population within castes. Ultimately, Ambedkar’s work offers a comprehensive analysis of caste as a social barrier, fundamentally questioning its validity and the ongoing struggles surrounding caste identity and reform in India. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

The Growth of Thought as Affecting the Progress of Society

William Withington

"The Growth of Thought as Affecting the Progress of Society" by William Withington is a philosophical treatise written in the mid-19th century. This work explores the intricate relationship between the evolution of human thought and societal advancement, positing that the development of intellectual life is crucial for progress. Withington delves into the nature of life itself, the role of self-love, and the influence of philosophy and religion on societal welfare. In the book, Withington outlines a framework for understanding the factors that contribute to human progress, emphasizing the need for a shift from materialistic and selfish motivations toward a more enlightened and benevolent approach. He discusses how social institutions, philosophy, and religion can educate and refine self-love, ultimately fostering a more harmonious society. The text argues that genuine welfare arises from a recognition of universal connections among individuals, suggesting that true self-interest aligns with the well-being of others. Through this exploration, Withington calls for a deeper examination of our motivations and the societal structures that shape our values, advocating for a transition towards a more thoughtful and compassionate society. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

Woman: Man's Equal

Thomas Webster

"Woman: Man's Equal" by Rev. Thomas Webster is a socio-religious discourse written in the late 19th century, specifically during the year 1873. This work argues for women's equality with men, challenging traditional views that have relegated women to subordinate roles based on outdated interpretations of both nature and scripture. The text examines historical injustices faced by women and advocates for their rights and capabilities in various spheres of life including education, profession, and citizenship. The opening of the volume sets the stage for an in-depth exploration of women's rights, beginning with a focus on "Natural Rights." It posits that any perceived inferiority of women is not a natural condition but rather a result of systematic societal oppression. The author discusses the coexistence of men and women as equals at creation and highlights the importance of granting women the same opportunities and responsibilities as men in professional and public life. Webster aims to dismantle long-standing prejudices, urging readers to consider the real competencies and achievements of women throughout history, thereby establishing a voice for their rights in contemporary society. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

Les préjugés nécessaires

Émile Faguet

Les préjugés nécessaires by Émile Faguet is a philosophical treatise written in the early 20th century. It examines how societies are built and held together by “necessary prejudices”—beliefs people adopt less from proof than from social need. Arguing that humans are naturally familial and only reluctantly social, it claims war both creates and sustains society, forging civic cohesion and recasting instincts. The work appears set to analyze core beliefs (such as love of life and free will) as instruments that align individuals with collective survival. The opening of this treatise questions whether humans are innately social, comparing us with solitary, social, and gregarious animals and concluding we most resemble the gregarious. It traces a path from prolonged childrearing to family, sedentarism, domestication, and agriculture, then argues that true society arose not from the family but from war driven by population pressure, which necessitated defensive coalitions, laws, and permanent states that elevate martial virtues. Faguet then defines “necessary prejudices” and illustrates two: love of life, which society redirects from personal impulse to patriotic self-sacrifice, and free will, treated as a probable illusion yet a socially imposed creed that grounds responsibility, punishment, remorse, and conversion. The section closes by canvassing critiques of volition (Spinoza, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Ribot) while explaining why belief in freedom persists because society requires it. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

Does civilization need religion? : A study in the social resources and limitations of religion in modern life

Reinhold Niebuhr

"Does civilization need religion? : A study in the social resources and…." by Reinhold Niebuhr is a treatise on religion and society written in the early 20th century. It examines whether and how religion can sustain personality, supply moral energy, and guide social life in a mechanized, secular age shaped by science and industrialism. The work argues that religion’s metaphysical plausibility and its social efficacy are both under pressure, yet it may still offer indispensable resources for ethical reconstruction. The opening of the treatise diagnoses religion’s waning influence in modern urban-industrial life, noting that science challenges a personalized universe while impersonal economic systems corrode respect for persons. It contrasts frantic orthodoxy and accommodating liberalism, arguing that the urgent crisis is not intellectual alone but moral: religion’s failure to make civilization ethical alienates especially the working classes. The author then sketches religion’s positive resources—reverence for personality, the courage to love and forgive beyond what reason alone sustains, humility before absolute standards, and a motive stronger than determinist cynicism—for building a just society. He critiques middle-class and urban forms of faith for private rectitude without social imagination, and traces how historic compromises made religion conservative (e.g., Protestantism’s ties to nationalism and commerce) while Catholicism at times exerted stricter social ethics. Finally, he contrasts medieval monastic rigor, Catholic economic restraints, and papal universalism with Protestant secularization and Puritan discipline, showing how virtues of industry and thrift slid into sanctified wealth and power, narrowing love of neighbor and oversimplifying ethics at the very point where modern society most needs depth. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

A preface to morals

Walter Lippmann

"A preface to morals" by Walter Lippmann is a work of social and moral philosophy written in the early 20th century. It examines the modern loss of religious certainty and authority, the emptiness that can follow emancipation from orthodoxy, and the need to find a credible, disciplined humanism to guide conduct in a secular world. Lippmann probes why both triumphant disbelief and nostalgic return fail to satisfy, and why moral life requires more than taste, mood, or fashion. The opening of the book traces the “problem of unbelief”: those no longer anchored by ancestral faith feel aimless despite newfound freedoms, and the liberal prophecy of deliverance has disappointed, leaving people nervously credulous and tempted by new cults. Lippmann contrasts modernist redefinitions of God (abstract, symbolic, or metaphysical) that lack compelling authority with fundamentalist demands for literal historical facts; he shows how the former cannot sustain popular devotion, while the latter, lacking a sure arbiter, collapses into schism—Catholic critique included. He argues that higher criticism and “decoding” Scripture (e.g., turning immortality into a platonic ideal) strip religion of the certainty and external sanction that once consoled, commanded, and unified ordinary believers. Finally, he sketches the “acids of modernity”: shifting political analogies for God, urbanization, mobility, media-driven novelty, and the loss of familiar landmarks all corrode piety; fundamentalist agitation appears as anxious compensation for a confidence that has already ebbed. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

The phantom public

Walter Lippmann

"The phantom public" by Walter Lippmann is a treatise on democratic theory written in the early 20th century. It argues that the omnicompetent, sovereign citizen imagined by democratic dogma does not exist, and that public opinion is intermittent, external to real decision-making, and best used to align force behind workable rules rather than to govern directly. The work reframes elections as mobilizations that substitute for civil war and proposes practical limits and responsibilities for the public’s role in politics. The opening of this work portrays a disengaged citizenry and uses evidence of widespread nonvoting to show that expecting the public to master complex affairs is unrealistic. It dismisses standard remedies—better schooling, moral exhortation, more direct democracy, or socialization of industry—as unable to produce an all-knowing public, and recasts citizens chiefly as bystanders whose votes align support rather than direct policy. It then sketches an ideal of public action: to neutralize arbitrary force, enable settlements by consent, and leave substantive problem-solving to those directly responsible, with government acting as a professional intermediary. Next, it defines “problems” as disharmonies created by uneven change (illustrated by population pressure, automobiles in cities, naval ratios, and economic scarcity), and argues that rights and duties are enforceable promises shaping a workable modus vivendi. Finally, it says the public should ask only two questions—whether a rule is defective and who can mend it—using coarse tests of assent and conformity, insisting on open debate to expose special pleading, and, at scale, choosing between Ins and Outs when crises persist. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

Race and nationality

Franz Boas

"Race and nationality by Franz Boas" is a scholarly essay in anthropology and social thought written in the early 20th century. The work challenges popular beliefs about race and nationalism, arguing that supposed racial instincts and pure racial types are myths, that nationality rests on shared culture more than blood or language, and that humanity should move toward a federation of nations. The essay rejects the idea that Europe’s conflict is a war of races, showing that physical types and ancestries are widely mixed and do not match national borders or languages. It dismantles the blond Aryan myth, finds no evidence for the inferiority of mixed populations, and explains that what we call race often masks national habit and sentiment. Nationality, it argues, grows from common habits, feelings, and political life; language can aid it but is not essential, as shown by places like Belgium and Switzerland, and even polyglot empires can develop shared civic ideals. While acknowledging nationalism’s creative role in enlarging the individual’s field of action, the essay warns against its aggressive, expansionist misuse in pan-movements. Tracing social evolution from small hordes to nations, it proposes the next step: a federation of nations with common aims, surpassing mere arbitration. It concludes that education should temper patriotic fervor with international ethics, and that war is defensible only to protect the integrity of essential ideals, not to impose one nation’s will on others. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

The future of an illusion

Sigmund Freud

The future of an illusion by Sigmund Freud is a psychoanalytic treatise written in the early 20th century. It examines religion as a collective illusion born from human wishes and childhood helplessness, and considers how civilization might sustain social order without sacred authority. Blending psychology, cultural critique, and philosophy, it argues for replacing religious foundations with rational, scientific understanding. The opening of the treatise defines culture as both the human conquest of nature and the regulation of social relations, stressing that it rests on labor, coercion, and instinctual renunciation that provoke resistance. It then turns to the “psychical” supports of culture—prohibitions and privations, their partial internalization as the super-ego, class grievances, the narcotic pride of cultural ideals, and the compensations of art—culminating in religion as the most powerful device. Religion is presented as a projection of infantile helplessness and father-longing that humanizes nature, promises justice and an afterlife, and asserts authority without proof; these doctrines are labeled “illusions” grounded in wish-fulfilment rather than evidence. Anticipating objections that society would collapse without faith, the text counters that laws should be justified by social necessity, recasts religion as a universal obsessional neurosis with totemic roots, and urges “education to reality” and gradual reliance on reason and science, even while admitting the transition will be slow and contested. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

Sibylla : or, The revival of prophecy

C. A. (Cecil Alec) Mace

"Sibylla : or, The revival of prophecy by C. A. Mace" is a speculative essay written in the early 20th century. It proposes that “prophecy” can be revived as disciplined scientific forecasting, arguing that modern science and psychology will increasingly predict—and deliberately shape—the future of society, industry, education, politics, and even human nature. Mace surveys recent “prophetic” thinking, contrasts gadget-focused futurism with biologically minded forecasts, and then sketches a coming revolution: the scientific management of mind and behavior. Using examples from industrial psychology, he shows how incentives, environment, and subtle social levers can steer work, policy, and public opinion, predicting propaganda refined into a precise art, humor as a political weapon, and war fought mainly by psychological means. He foresees education reorganized around natural rhythms and lifelong study, a tight weave of factory–school–clinic guidance, and universities challenged by mass broadcasting. He extends this control to eugenics and selection, speculates on altered senses, memory, and specialized languages, and traces moral trends toward reduced cruelty and self-conscious, cooler emotions. Society, he suggests, will stratify into a small, tested technocratic elite and a contented majority, with sport fading as work and play merge under scientific planning. He closes by questioning whether such mastery brings happiness or virtue, noting that desire expands as achievement does, leaving fulfillment perpetually just out of reach. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

Jewish influences in American life : volume III of the International Jew, the world's foremost problem : being a reprint of a third selection from articles appearing in the Dearborn Independent

William John Cameron

"Jewish influences in American life : volume III of the International Jew, the…" is a polemical collection of newspaper articles written in the early 20th century. Drawn from the Dearborn Independent, it advances an antisemitic narrative that alleges sweeping Jewish influence over American culture, religion, politics, finance, and popular entertainment. The volume positions itself as an exposé of a so‑called “Jewish Question,” framing its arguments as fact-finding while leaning heavily on hostile interpretation and sensational claims. The opening of the book lays out a preface asserting that earlier installments spurred national debate and that the paper’s “facts” are indisputable, followed by a table of contents signaling targets such as religion, jazz, baseball, Bolshevism, Tammany Hall, Zionism, and the Federal Reserve. The first chapters argue that criticism of the series is not about “religious persecution” of Jews but, rather, that organized Jewish groups purportedly persecute Christianity; they cite selected press clippings and episodes involving public prayers, holidays, schools, and civic rituals to claim Jewish hostility to Christian symbols. The next chapter extends this line, alleging Jewish attacks on multiple Christian denominations and suggesting that “liberal” Christianity converges with Judaism, predicting the erosion of distinct Christian beliefs. The narrative then pivots to professional sports, using the Black Sox scandal to claim Jewish gamblers and businessmen corrupted baseball, naming figures like Arnold Rothstein and Abe Attell, and spinning managerial and governance struggles—such as the “Lasker Plan” and Judge Landis’s appointment—into a story of mounting Jewish control. Throughout, the text presents these accusations as documentation, but its opening portion is plainly a series of assertions and curated anecdotes designed to portray Jewish influence as pervasive and malign. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

Resist not evil

Clarence Darrow

"Resist not evil" by Clarence Darrow is a political-philosophical treatise written in the early 20th century. It contends that states, armies, and courts are instruments of force, that punishment fails to reform or deter, and that non-resistance and humane solidarity offer the only rational path to social health. The opening of the treatise acknowledges Tolstoy’s influence and sets out a case for non-resistance by tracing the state’s origins to conquest and its modern continuity through armies, police, courts, and prisons. It argues that militarism burdens and brutalizes society, patriotism indoctrinates obedience, and standing armies chiefly exist to control domestic workers rather than repel foreign foes. Civil government is presented as militarism in disguise, enforcing property and class rule; punishment is portrayed as vengeance masquerading as justice, with shifting definitions of crime and arbitrary, harmful penalties. Early chapters attack deterrence—highlighting the brutalizing effect of public executions and the futility of prisons—and reframe crime as a social disease rooted in poverty, environment, and heredity, noting rises in “crime” in winter, hard times, and overcrowded old countries. They conclude that just judgment is impossible, proportional punishment cannot be measured, and state penalties multiply suffering by injuring families and communities, whereas food, opportunity, and kindness would address causes. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

Dans les Entrailles de la Terre

Séverine

"Dans les Entrailles de la Terre by Séverine" is an investigative reportage written in the early 20th century. The piece examines the perilous lives of French coal miners, brought into stark focus by the catastrophic Courrières disaster, and emphasizes the daily hazards, grinding poverty, and moral urgency of reform. The narrative moves from public shock to sustained critique, setting the Courrières tragedy against a long history of “smaller” but frequent mine deaths. It vividly depicts the underground ordeal—crawling in narrow, dark galleries under constant threat of water bursts and firedamp—alongside meager wages diminished by obligatory expenses. Through poignant vignettes, it shows bereaved families, such as a widow dyeing her family’s few garments black, a young wife undone by grief, and artisanship like crucifixes carved from bone. It exposes unsafe company housing above shifting ground, while honoring miners’ courage during rescues, from refusing to butcher a dead pit horse to the loyal dog mourning its masters. The author descends into a deadly pit between explosions and visits a hospital of burned and suffocating survivors, closing with a forceful appeal for justice, lasting safety measures, and humane consideration for those who toil in the earth’s depths. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

Africana; or, the heart of heathen Africa, Volume 1 (of 2) : Native customs and beliefs

Duff Macdonald

"Africana; or, the heart of heathen Africa, Volume 1 (of 2) : Native customs…." by Rev. Duff Macdonald is an ethnographic and missionary account written in the late 19th century. It sets out to systematize the beliefs, practices, and social life of East Central African peoples from close field observation, especially around Blantyre and Lake Nyasa. The volume surveys religion, law, family life, arts, language, and governance through a missionary lens, aiming to inform and reform Christian mission methods while introducing readers to largely undocumented customs. The opening of the work explains the author’s purpose: to record customs before mission contact alters them, and to caution against missionaries assuming civil authority. He details the pitfalls of gathering reliable data—European bias in questions, “polite” answers from informants, interpreter and idiom traps (especially yes/no and before/after), and the distortions caused by note‑taking—then argues for the value of such study to psychology, ethnology, and the science of religion. Early chapters sketch first impressions: scant dress, heavy tattooing and lip rings, ubiquitous weapons, round smoke‑filled huts with rats, a predictable climate, maize porridge and beer, generous hospitality, light division of labor, and the local mosaic of Wayao, Machinga, Anyasa, Angulu, and Magololo chiefs; travel on winding footpaths, formal salutations, and women’s inferior status. Arts include ironworking, basketry, bark cloth, pottery, and simple music; “learned” roles blend herbalist and diviner, with witchcraft trials by poison and widespread charms. A rich oral literature—conundrums, sung tales with refrains, and word‑play chains—features animal fables and origin stories (pots, houses, death, monkeys). The theology section begins by defining spirit (lisoka, msimu, mulungu), treating the spirits of the dead as the operative gods, worshiped at verandah trees, bedsides, or mountain tops, and known through answered prayers. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

French morality, under the regulation system

Julie-Victoire Daubié

"French morality, under the regulation system" by Julie-Victoire Daubié is a social reform treatise written in the late 19th century. It condemns the state “regulation” of prostitution, arguing that police-tolerated brothels, legal privileges for men, and economic desperation for women together entrench exploitation and corrode society. Drawing on research, official reports, legal cases, and historical comparison, it urges equal legal responsibility for men, better wages and protections for women, firm action against procuring and public solicitation, and humane refuges for those seeking to leave prostitution. The opening of the work frames the issue through a preface and a letter calling on British lawmakers to reject regulationism and pursue just, gender-neutral laws, then launches into a stark analysis of how poverty, low wages, ignorance, and seduction funnel girls and women into both registered and clandestine prostitution. It details the capitalized business of brothel-keeping, police complicity, and the contrast between destitute street women and lavishly kept courtesans, even extending the critique to colonial Algeria. The next section shows many “penitent” women’s shame and maternal devotion, surveys historic Church- and state-backed refuges, and argues that charity alone is inadequate without curbing male profligacy. A legal survey contrasts ancient and medieval severity toward panders and male clients with modern France’s protection of male debauchees and persecution of women, illustrating hypocrisy through courtroom examples and annulled debts to mistresses. Finally, the early pages of a chapter on male prostitution indict students, officials, and soldiers—linking student seduction and abandonment, an ex-official’s public scandals, and military marriage restrictions and court leniency—to show how institutional practices normalize and spread vice. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

A marxizmus társadalomelmélete : Elméleti kritika és történelmi tanulságok

László Ottlik

"A marxizmus társadalomelmélete : Elméleti kritika és történelmi tanulságok" by Ottlik László is a scholarly treatise written in the early 20th century. The work offers a rigorous critique of Marxist social theory—especially its claims to scientific inevitability and its doctrine of historical materialism—paired with reflections drawn from recent history. It interrogates the logical, methodological, and ethical premises behind socialist prophecy and the notion of a predetermined communist future. The opening of the treatise explains why Marxism retains mass appeal despite decades of criticism, attributing its power to material promises, moral indignation at inequality, and quasi-religious belief, while arguing that prior critiques miss the core fatalistic “scientific” prediction. It then presents Marx’s famous forecast of capital concentration and the “expropriation of the expropriators,” situates it in the age of positivism and evolutionism, and contends that exact social prediction is impossible unless one illegitimately excludes the conscious human factor. The author defends the stability of human moral nature against socialist rationalism, arguing that utopian schemes ignore enduring psychological realities. He next dissects “historical materialism,” quoting Marx’s preface, and claims it is misnamed economism and, in effect, fatalism; he faults the neglect of psychology, the undefined notion of “class,” and dialectical vagueness. Citing Engels’s later letters that retreat to “interaction” among factors, he argues the original one-way determination collapses, and notes that serious historians had long integrated economic causes (e.g., readings of Rome’s decline). The section concludes by tracing the prophecy’s roots to Hegel’s “negation of the negation” and the utopia of a marketless society, exposing logical gaps (such as those highlighted by Oppenheimer) and emphasizing that collapse does not entail communism; the author then sets up three logical paths for capitalism’s future to examine next. (This is an automatically generated summary.)

L'évolution actuelle du monde: illusions et réalités

Gustave Le Bon

"L'évolution actuelle du monde: illusions et réalités" by Gustave Le Bon is a socio-political and psychological treatise written in the early 20th century. It analyzes how modern civilization is being reshaped by the clash of material innovations (steam, electricity, coal, oil) and immaterial forces (beliefs, mysticism, crowd psychology), and it probes the illusions surrounding peace, security, disarmament, alliances, and arbitration. The work argues that destructive collective passions, revolutionary faiths, and ancestral legacies threaten Europe even as America rises, and that only a hard-headed grasp of collective psychology and economic realities can temper conflict. The opening of this treatise sketches a world poised between an old order and a new one, driven by creative, conservative, and destructive forces: Europe is fractured by border rivalries and party strife, dictatorships emerge, Britain is shaken by strikes and imperial strain, Russia regresses, the East is in turmoil, while America amasses wealth and influence. Le Bon warns that science has multiplied destructive means, that the League of Nations and legalistic arbitration cannot overcome clashing mentalities, and that alliances endure only while interests align—economic arrangements may preserve peace better than pacts. He stresses that collective forces are irrational, future wars may be internal and ideological, and that syndicalism and socialism function as modern religions responding to a persistent human need for faith. Early chapters contrast material power (especially coal and oil) with immaterial power (mysticism and belief), illustrate enduring credulity—even among eminent scientists—with spiritist and pseudo-scientific episodes, and lay out laws for how beliefs spread. He then posits the “soul of the race,” the commanding will of the dead shaping the living, to explain national continuity and the instability of mixed peoples, using France’s oscillations and other historical cases. Finally, he attributes major political disasters to errors of psychology, notes how personalities transform under revolutionary conditions, and critiques pacifist, disarmament, alliance, and arbitration illusions, concluding that only unity and credible defense can provide real security. (This is an automatically generated summary.)